Bill C-228 — Loi modifiant la Loi sur le ministère des Affaires étrangères, du Commerce et du Développement (examen parlementaire préalable des traités)
This proposed law, called C-228, wanted to change how Canada makes agreements with other countries, called treaties. Right now, the government can agree to treaties without Parliament's direct input beforehand. This proposed law wanted to make it so that Parliament would get to look at and talk about treaties *before* Canada officially agreed to them. This change would have affected all Canadians because treaties can impact many things, like trade, the environment, and human rights. It would have also affected the government, by requiring them to share treaty information with Parliament earlier in the process. This proposed law mattered because it would have given Members of Parliament more say in important international agreements. Some people believe this would make Canada's treaty-making process more transparent and democratic. However, because the proposed law did not pass, the current process remains in place.
I think we need more openness when making treaties with other countries. I want Parliament to look at treaties and give advice before we agree to them, especially big ones. I support Bill C-228 because it will make sure the treaty process is more democratic.

I think this bill is not about being open. It would make it harder to make treaties by adding work for committees. I worry it would hurt Canada's place in the world, and committees would just approve treaties without really looking at them.
Simplification...
Where this proposed law falls on the policy spectrums that Canadians care about
Choisissez vos 3 priorités pour voir comment ce projet de loi correspond à ce qui vous tient à cœur.
Inscription gratuite — 30 sCe projet de loi vise à rendre le processus de ratification des traités plus transparent en obligeant le gouvernement à déposer les traités importants à la Chambre des communes avant de les ratifier. Cependant, il contient une clause d'exception qui pourrait permettre au gouvernement de contourner ces exigences dans des circonstances exceptionnelles, ce qui pourrait limiter son efficacité.
Things to Watch For
- La définition de « circonstances exceptionnelles » n'est pas claire, ce qui pourrait mener à son utilisation fréquente.
- Le projet de loi ne précise pas les conséquences si le gouvernement ne respecte pas les délais de dépôt des documents.
- Il n'y a pas de mécanisme clair pour assurer que les commentaires du Parlement soient réellement pris en compte avant la ratification.
- Le projet de loi ne prévoit pas de consultation obligatoire avec les provinces et territoires, même si le traité a un impact sur leurs compétences.
Click any step to learn what it means
Ce projet de loi n'a pas progressé
Loading...
Click any step to learn what it means
Ce projet de loi n'a pas progressé
Loading...
This bill was voted down and did not become law.
Connectez-vous pour rejoindre la discussion.
Chargement des commentaires...