Mario Simard
- Career
- Political science lecturer, press secretary
- Political Experience
- Elected to the House of Commons of Canada in the 2019 election from Jonquière in Quebec as a member of the Bloc Québécois. Served as the critic of intergovernmental affairs, natural resources and energy in the Bloc Québécois Shadow Cabinet of the 44th Parliament of Canada. Elected the vice chair of the Canadian House of Commons Standing Committee on Natural Resources in the 45th Canadian Parliament in 2025.
Based on publicly available information — may contain inaccuracies
Business & Financial Interests
Before entering federal politics, Mario Simard had a career in education. He was a history and geography teacher at the Cégep de Jonquière. In addition to teaching, he was actively involved in union activities, serving as president of the teachers' union at the Cégep (Syndicat des enseignantes et enseignants du Cégep de Jonquière).
Key Relationships & Connections
As a member of the Bloc Québécois caucus, Mario Simard's key political relationship is with the party's leader, Yves-François Blanchet. His past role as a union president also indicates strong ties to the public sector labour movement in Quebec, particularly within the education sector.
Public Controversies
In May 2021, Mario Simard was involved in a controversy during a virtual House of Commons committee meeting. Conservative MP Michelle Rempel Garner accused him of making a threatening comment towards her, reportedly telling her to "watch out" if she travelled to Quebec. Simard later issued an apology in the House of Commons, stating that his words were misunderstood and were not intended as a personal threat. He explained his comment was meant as a political warning about the reception she might receive in the province due to her party's positions.
Where Mario falls on key policy spectrums
Your Money
People & Society
How We're Governed
Land & Community
Mario Simard won with 20,247 votes (40.0%)
Total votes cast: 50,629
How does Mario Simard's voting record line up with your values?
Mr. Speaker, earlier in his speech, my colleague referred to Enbridge's CEO. There is a quote I like from the Enbridge CEO. He said he was not willing to take the financial risks that come with a pipeline. The CEO of Enbridge believes that, if a pipeline is to be built, it should be paid for with public money. The pipeline project they are talking about and for which the government wants to
Mr. Speaker, we have seen this in the past. What do oil companies do when the government cuts fuel taxes? They boost their refining margins. We need to put a mechanism in place if we want to have a direct impact on the price of oil. The best mechanism would perhaps be some type of price management system to ensure that the gluttonous oil and gas sectors do not take advantage of the fact that the
Mr. Speaker, I agree with my colleague 100%. What happened every time the government was lenient with the oil and gas industry by saying it would bring prices at the pump down for consumers? The oil and gas industry turned around and boosted its refining margins, essentially pocketing the tax cut. That is just obscene, especially considering that these huge corporations raked in record profits in
C-264 Mr. Speaker, it goes without saying that the Bloc Québécois will be voting against Bill, which simply seeks to repeal the Oil Tanker Moratorium Act. When I look at this, I see an irrational bill that can perhaps only be explained by an ideological mindset we are seeing more and more of, one that amounts to saying that anything goes for the oil industry. I will explain what I mean when I
Berthier—Maskinongé Beauharnois—Salaberry—Soulanges—Huntingdon Mr. Speaker, earlier, my colleagues fromandpointed out in their speeches that, with its new majority, the government has a frustrating tendency to no longer listen to the opposition parties. That is what happened with this bill. Some amendments were set aside. I know that the member for Winnipeg North enjoys sparring in the House.
Mr. Speaker, I want to come back to something. My colleague from Berthier—Maskinongé clearly described the new dynamic in his speech. Now that the Liberals have a majority, they sometimes forget that democracy is not about saying, “I won, so shut up”. They still have to listen to what the opposition parties have to say. I know that my colleague from Berthier—Maskinongé, who is also our whip, is
Mr. Speaker, I congratulate my colleague on his bill, which is intrinsically valuable and very interesting. I only have a small concern that I wish to share. Generally speaking, prescription drugs and health are areas of jurisdiction that fall to Quebec and the provinces. When we look at this bill more closely, it is clear that it is lacking a process for carrying out direct consultation.
Mr. Speaker, they were not that clear yesterday. We will say it again: Democracy means 50% of the votes plus one. That is the threshold everywhere, for the laws passed here, for elections, for the people who are here. It is the same for everyone. An attack on that is an attack, in Quebec's case, on a people's right to self-determination. It is an attack on Quebec's Bill 99, which establishes the
C-265 Mr. Speaker, it is a pleasure to speak today on Bill. It is worth emphasizing that the intention behind this bill is a very noble one. Facilitating access to therapeutic products for patients seeking access to innovative drugs or therapies when that is their only remaining option is a highly commendable objective, it must be said. I would like to point out that many members, like myself,
Prime Minister Minister of Justice Mr. Speaker, yesterday, theand hisconfirmed that any future referendum will be subject to the undemocratic Clarity Act. They want to pick the question and decide what constitutes a majority. We would remind them that a democratic majority is 50% of the votes plus one. That is the rule wherever democracy exists. We would also remind them that the difference
Mr. Speaker, I rise today to talk about a great man. Gérald Savard has served as the mayor of the municipality of Bégin for nearly 30 years. He is descended from a long line of public servants. Like his father and grandfather, he has dedicated his life to serving the people of his municipality. Gérald also served as reeve of the Fjord-du-Saguenay RCM for 13 years, during which he dedicated
C-5 Mr. Speaker, the Liberals passed Billto expedite so-called projects of national interest. That allows the government to get around laws that could hinder the construction of pipelines. Now, the government has a new solution: To speed up its pipelines, it is simply going to tear up the regulations. If the regulatory framework is slowing down the construction of oil pipelines, then the