Aslam Rana

C-39 Mr. Speaker, I would like to ask the member of the opposition about the $500-billion promises that were made during the Toronto summit. We signed over 23 agreements around the world for those economic projects, which is proof of our great leadership. Billis also the next step to build Canada strong. I would like to ask the member of the opposition why he will not work with us and approve the [plus]

Thank you, Madam Chair. Thank you to all of the witnesses. My question is for the National Research Council. According to NRC's 2025-26 annual report, NRC researchers published 1,414 articles in peer-reviewed publications in 2025. How many were in English, in French, and in both languages, please?

Thank you. The report recommends a research in French support and promotion fund worth at least $40 million a year, roughly 1% of the federal research funding. Do you think there are some existing federal programs or initiatives that could support the report?

Thank you. Mr. Vats, since the Official Languages Act was modernized in 2023 and the action plan for official languages 2023-28 was adopted, what positive measures have the department and its agencies taken under part VII to support research in French?

What policies ensure your researchers' work is accessible in both official languages?

Thank you. The report found that French plays a marginal role in research activities within the federal public service. What positive measures is the NRC taking under part VII of the Official Languages Act to support the creation and dissemination of scientific information in French?

What indicators do you use to measure the results?

Yes.

Thank you very much.

Okay. Are there some jurisdictions, such as Australia, Europe or the U.S., that regulate natural health products in a way that balances access and safety better than Canada does?

Okay. Without the minister's powers to order a recall, what happens if contaminated or dangerous natural health products are on the store shelves tomorrow? What would the procedure or the course of action be to guarantee the safety of Canadians?

Thank you, Mr. Chair. My question is for the Canadian Pharmacists Association. A 2021 review of Health Canada's natural health products program that was carried out by the commissioner of the environment and sustainable development concluded, “Health Canada's oversight of natural health products available for sale in Canada fell short of ensuring that products were safe and effective.” What in [plus]

Thank you. In your opinion, should mandatory reporting of serious adverse reactions by health care institutions continue for NHPs even if Vanessa's Law powers are removed? Why or why not?