Aller au contenu principal
Le Parlement reprend le lundi 2 novembre
Back to Bills
S-217Projet de loi abandonné

Bill S-217 — Loi sur la réaffectation de certains biens saisis, bloqués ou mis sous séquestre

Loi sur la réaffectation des biens bloqués

Traduit automatiquement
Introduced Nov 23, 2021·Last discussed Oct 17, 2022
Résumé

This proposed law wanted to change how the government uses money and property taken from criminals. If passed, the government could have used these seized assets to help people hurt by the criminals' actions. Instead of just keeping the money, it could go towards compensating victims. This change would affect anyone who has been harmed by criminal activity where assets are seized. It could include victims of fraud, human rights abuses, or other crimes where the government takes money or property from the people responsible. This proposed law was important because it could have provided a way for victims to get some form of justice and compensation. It showed an effort to turn something negative, like seized criminal assets, into something positive by directly helping those who suffered. However, because this proposed law didn't move forward, the government still cannot use seized assets to compensate victims.

Bill Timeline
Introduced in the Senate
Nov 23, 2021
Approved in principle (Senate)
Mar 1, 2022
Vote on Bill S-217Passed
Yea Nay
Oct 20, 2026
Where This Lands on Key Issues

Where this proposed law falls on the policy spectrums that Canadians care about

Choisissez vos 3 priorités pour voir comment ce projet de loi correspond à ce qui vous tient à cœur.

Inscription gratuite — 30 s
Bill Quality
Solid

This proposed law allows the government to repurpose assets seized from people who commit international human rights abuses. It creates a way to use these funds to help victims and support humanitarian efforts, but relies on court decisions about who gets the money and how it's used.

Things to Watch For

  • The law depends on courts to decide who gets the money, which could lead to inconsistent results.
  • It does not guarantee that victims will be the primary beneficiaries of the funds.
  • The process for applying for funds is not clearly defined, potentially creating barriers for some applicants.
  • The law doesn't specify how the registry of frozen assets will be maintained or updated.
  • It is unclear how the law will handle situations where multiple parties claim a right to the same assets.
Progress

Click any step to learn what it means

Ce projet de loi n'a pas progressé

What Do You Think?

Loading...

Discussion

Connectez-vous pour rejoindre la discussion.

Chargement des commentaires...