Aller au contenu principal
Le Parlement siège aujourd'hui·Jour 57 sur 125 jours de séance
Back to Bills
S-213À la deuxième lecture au Sénat

Bill S-213 — Loi modifiant la Loi électorale du Canada (données démographiques)

Voter demographic data law

Traduit automatiquement
Introduced May 27, 2025·Last discussed May 5, 2026
Résumé

This proposed law wants to change how Canada collects information during elections. Right now, we don't know a lot about the people who vote. This proposed law would ask people to share their age, gender, and if they are Indigenous when they vote. You wouldn't have to answer, but it would be encouraged. This change would affect everyone who votes in Canada. It would also affect political parties and groups that try to get people to vote. Elections Canada would use the information to understand who is voting and who isn't. This could help them make sure everyone has a fair chance to participate in elections. Knowing who votes and who doesn't is important. It helps us see if some groups are being left out. If we know who isn't voting, we can try to fix the problem. This could make our democracy stronger and fairer for everyone.

Bill Timeline
Introduced in the Senate
May 27, 2025
Where This Lands on Key Issues

Where this proposed law falls on the policy spectrums that Canadians care about

Choisissez vos 3 priorités pour voir comment ce projet de loi correspond à ce qui vous tient à cœur.

Inscription gratuite — 30 s
Bill Quality
Solid

This proposed law aims to increase diversity in Canadian politics by requiring parties to report on their efforts to include designated groups and women. It also brings back the collection of demographic data from candidates, nomination contestants, and leadership contestants, which is a positive step for transparency.

Things to Watch For

  • The law only applies to parties that received a certain percentage of votes, potentially excluding smaller parties' diversity efforts.
  • The effectiveness of parties' diversity programs is self-assessed, which may lead to biased reporting.
  • The law doesn't specify consequences for parties that fail to meet their stated diversity targets or provide adequate explanations.
  • The definition of 'designated groups' relies on the Employment Equity Act, which may not cover all groups that parties aim to include.
  • The timeline for implementing diversity plans is left to the parties, potentially delaying progress.
  • The law relies on voluntary self-identification, which may result in incomplete or skewed demographic data.
Progress

Click any step to learn what it means

What Do You Think?

Loading...

Discussion

Connectez-vous pour rejoindre la discussion.

Chargement des commentaires...