Aller au contenu principal
Le Parlement siège aujourd'hui·Jour 57 sur 125 jours de séance
Back to Bills
C-270À la deuxième lecture à la Chambre des communes

Bill C-270 — Loi modifiant le Code criminel (défense de la personne)

Loi sur la protection de nos foyers

Traduit automatiquement
Introduced Mar 12, 2026·Last discussed Mar 19, 2026
Résumé

This proposed law, called the "Stand on Guard Act," would change the rules about self-defense in Canada. It focuses on situations where someone breaks into a home. The proposed law says that if someone is in their home legally, they can use whatever force they think is needed, even deadly force, to defend themselves or others from an intruder. This change would mostly affect homeowners and anyone who lives in a house. It also affects people who might break into homes. The proposed law assumes that someone who breaks into a home intends to use force against the people inside. Because of this assumption, it would be easier for homeowners to argue they acted in self-defense if they hurt or kill an intruder. This matters because it could change how the law views self-defense in your home. It could give homeowners more freedom to protect themselves, but it could also lead to more violence. It's important to understand these changes to know your rights and responsibilities.

Bill Timeline
Introduced in the House
Mar 12, 2026
Where This Lands on Key Issues

Where this proposed law falls on the policy spectrums that Canadians care about

Choisissez vos 3 priorités pour voir comment ce projet de loi correspond à ce qui vous tient à cœur.

Inscription gratuite — 30 s
Bill Quality
Solid

This proposed law makes it clearer that people can use force, even deadly force, to defend themselves against intruders in their homes. It also assumes the intruder intended to cause harm, unless proven otherwise, which could make it easier for homeowners to argue self-defense.

Things to Watch For

  • The law doesn't define what counts as 'evidence to the contrary,' which could lead to confusion in court.
  • It does not address situations outside of a dwelling-house, potentially leaving people vulnerable in other locations.
  • The law could disproportionately affect marginalized groups who are more likely to be suspected of unlawful entry, even if they have legitimate reasons to be there.
Progress

Click any step to learn what it means

What Do You Think?

Loading...

Discussion

Connectez-vous pour rejoindre la discussion.

Chargement des commentaires...