Vincent Ho
Based on publicly available information — may contain inaccuracies
Business & Financial Interests
Before being elected to Parliament, Vincent Ho had a career as a lawyer. He was reportedly a partner at the law firm Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP, where his practice focused on corporate and securities law. His work involved advising clients on public offerings, mergers and acquisitions, and corporate governance matters.
Where Vincent falls on key policy spectrums
Your Money
People & Society
How We're Governed
Land & Community
How does Vincent Ho's voting record line up with your values?
There's a special point.... It's a very important bill.
It's about predictability. To many people, the CPP might not be enough. They look at their OAS and, if applicable, GIS. If they get their CPP, that might not be enough to sustain their lifestyle. We know, for example, that for the younger generation now, home ownership is lower than before. A lot of the time people expect that when they retire and their mortgage is paid off.... They still have
Wow, you're admitting there's a recession. Congratulations.
Okay. I'm trying to make original arguments.
Yes, we just heard “recession”. That's breaking news right there. It's a reasonable request. I don't see why we would oppose this. This amendment is specific, but not so prescriptive that, if we get the minister or the CPP to produce the information and present it in a way that works for them, also producing more information that contributes.... There are lots of side conversations happening
There are several parties talking, actually. There are several conversations.
I appreciate the feedback on that, Madam Chair. The amendment here is talking about a report. It's about transparency. My argument is to submit that these transparency measures are important; it's about who's going to benefit from these transparency measures. It's not a rehashing of existing information that could be readily available. This is about disclosing additional information. Again,
I find it kind of condescending when some of the members say that we're somehow creating a bureaucracy or trying to slow things down, when it actually does the opposite. It's to equip the government to make some well-informed choices. I think it's a common-sense amendment that all parliamentarians can support. Why would we not want more information? This information is already being collected.