This vote decides how Parliament will deal with Bill C-26, a proposed law to spend money on housing.
What They Voted On
That, notwithstanding any standing order or usual practice of the House, Bill C-26, An Act to authorize certain payments to be made out of the Consolidated Revenue Fund for the purpose of improving housing supply , be disposed of as follows: (a) the bill be ordered for consideration at the second reading stage immediately after the adoption of this order; (b) when the House begins debate at the second reading stage of the bill, one member of each recognized party, a member of the New Democratic Party, and the member of the Green Party, may each speak at the said stage for not more than 20 minutes, followed by 10 minutes for questions and comments, provided that members may be permitted to split their time with another member; (c) at the conclusion of the time provided for the debate at the second reading stage or when no member wishes to speak, whichever is earlier, all questions necessary to dispose of the second reading stage of the bill shall be put without further debate or amendment; (d) if the bill is adopted at the second reading stage, it shall be deemed referred to a committee of the whole, deemed considered in committee of the whole, deemed reported without amendment, deemed concurred in at report stage, and deemed read a third time and passed; and (e) during consideration of the bill, (i) after 8:30 p.m., no quorum calls, dilatory motions or requests for unanimous consent shall be received by the Chair, (ii) the House shall not adjourn, except pursuant to a motion moved by a minister of the Crown, (iii) no motion to adjourn the debate may be moved except by a minister of the Crown.
What This Vote Is Really About
This vote is not directly about whether to spend money on housing. Instead, it's about how a proposed law called Bill C-26 will be handled in Parliament. Bill C-26 is about spending government money to help build more houses. This vote is a special request to speed up the process for Bill C-26, meaning the usual steps for reviewing and debating a proposed law would be mostly skipped. If this vote passes, Bill C-26 will move through the House of Commons much faster than normal. This means there will be very little time for members of Parliament to debate the details of the proposed law, suggest changes, or have it carefully reviewed by a committee. The proposed law to spend money on housing could become approved by the House of Commons almost immediately after its main idea is first debated and voted on. Citizens should care because this vote affects how thoroughly a proposed law is examined before it becomes real. When a proposed law is fast-tracked, it means there's less opportunity for different viewpoints to be heard, for potential problems to be found, or for improvements to be made. While speeding up a proposed law might seem good for urgent issues like housing, it also means less public discussion and less detailed review of how government money will be spent and what the rules will be.
Related Bill
Government to Spend Money on Housing
This proposed law is about spending government money. The goal is to build more houses. The money would come from the government's general fund.
Hover over a seat to see details, click to view the member's profile.