Kyle Seeback

Mr. Speaker, did the minister say anywhere in that answer that she was really going to sue? No. It is all talk and no results with the Liberals. She went on a diatribe about a whole bunch of things that the opposition should do in the face of American tariffs. Here is news for the minister: They are the government. They are the one who are supposed to do something about it. I will go back to [more]

industry minister Mr. Speaker, 10 months ago, thepromised that she was going to sue Stellantis and get the jobs back. Did she sue? No. Did she get the jobs back? No. Guess what. The industry minister is now saying that she is going to sue Stelco and get the jobs back. Has she sued? No. Has she got the jobs back? No. minister When will thestop the talk and get results? Does her word to workers [more]

Mr. Speaker, we have been in a trade war, and everyone knows this, with America, and there have been real consequences because of that: The Stellantis plant in Brampton closed, Paccar had major layoffs, Stelco now has layoffs, and hundreds of business across this country are laying off workers. The Liberals had a solution: Buy Canadian. What were the results? They bought American. They have [more]

Mr. Speaker, the Liberals must have a different definition of what buy Canada means than what we think buy Canada means. If we are buying Canadian, we do not actually increase the amount of money we are sending to America. It is a pretty simple economic lesson. Why did the Liberals do this? It is because their buy Canada is all illusions. They are all talk, no results. If we are in the middle of [more]

Another thing that I've found deeply troubling has been the offshoring of tech jobs. I know that Unifor is part of the Canadian Telecommunications Workers Alliance. Recently, 115 specialized network operator positions were eliminated in Canada. They were outsourced, I believe, to India. Not only are these high-paying, specialized jobs by a Canadian telecommunications company, but there's also a [more]

One thing I also discovered was that consultation with unions prior to the issuance of temporary foreign worker permits was removed by the Liberal government in 2018. I've asked ministers if they would restore that, because I think it's a great safety check. There's been no commitment to do that. I assume that you would support that.

Thank you very much, Mr. Chair. Lana, it's nice to see you again. I think the last time we met was in Ottawa. We certainly talked about softwood lumber and about how important that and the auto sector are. I do have another question to ask you, though. In doing some research over the last little while, I discovered that in 2025 there were 126,000 unemployed skilled tradespeople in Canada. At [more]

I think I have about 30 seconds left. I have one last thing. Regarding the consultations that are going on with respect to changes to the Canada Labour Code by the Liberals, the rumour I'm hearing is that certain sectors of the Canadian economy, especially in supply chains, will be made essential services, thereby removing the right to strike. I think that's also deeply troubling. I wonder if [more]

Madam Speaker, there is no doubt that this is not the same Liberal Party it was a few years ago, which was constantly trying to beat down resource projects. Imagine, if it had actually approved things like energy east, what position we would be in. Imagine if it had built LNG liquefaction facilities across the country. Europe is begging for that. It took it 10 years, but I guess, as we say, a [more]

Madam Speaker, I feel like I have been here before, because we debated a bill that was supposed to get things built about 18 months ago, and not only get things built, but get things built at speeds we had never seen before. Unfortunately, what we saw were things getting built at the exact same speed they have been built for 11 years under the Liberal government. Not a single new project was [more]

Madam Speaker, I know this segment is called questions and comments, and that was mostly a comment. I am not sure what the question is, because as I said, we want to study the legislation. I will turn it into a question for the member: Will the Liberals allow the legislation to be studied? At the member's next opportunity, will he get up today and tell the House that the Liberals are going to [more]

Prime Minister Madam Speaker, I would agree with the member. Thehas shown remarkable contempt for Parliament. He shows up to answer barely any questions in the chamber. The Liberals ram pieces of legislation through. They use programming motions to make sure there is very little debate on them. We have received no commitment from the Liberals that there will be ample days to study the bill at [more]