Karim Bardeesy

Mr. Speaker, I am very engaged in this debate and my colleague's speech. We share adjoining ridings. Therefore, some of the concerns and questions that my colleague is hearing are also being asked in Taiaiako'n—Parkdale—High Park. I want to ask her, given her experience in this Parliament, to speak about the continuity pieces around the environmental regulations here. Also, would she not agree [more]

Presumably, that also includes the kinds of investments that the government might be making in research and IP protection, the kinds of things that can result not only in more exportability but also in more value capture in Canada. That would be part of the overall thinking around the policy.

There were a few questions as well about the future export footprint of Canadian autos outside of the United States. I'm just wondering, can you speak more generally to not just the vehicle itself but some of the inputs into vehicles, including software and critical minerals, which then result in battery supply chains? Can you speak to the growth of that part of the assembly and auto sector as [more]

The framework also rewards companies that are doing the manufacturing here in Canada, at levels that are consonant with or in excess of what is being sold here in Canada.

Thank you.

The estimates also reflect some increased investments in research more broadly through the three main granting councils and also through defence research. I'm wondering if you could share the intended impact of those investments, not just for the researchers themselves but for the potential downstream beneficiaries in the economy.

Thank you very much. I have a couple of questions about auto and then a couple of questions about other policy files. In the earlier round, there were some questions about the automotive remissions framework. I'm wondering, can you just explain the government's thinking for the creation of the remission frameworks and then, maybe, provide an explanation of how it works?

Mr. Speaker, my colleague did a very good job of explaining the context that gave rise to this bill. Can she tell us more about what this bill will do for the people of Terrebonne?

Mr. Speaker, I really enjoyed the speech by my colleague from Bourassa. As he pointed out, this bill is targeted and aims to address a very specific situation in today's global context. Could he explain how this measure is in keeping with the government's wider range of efforts, including those he himself had in mind to improve affordability and the cost of living?

Madam Speaker, I very much appreciated my colleague's speech. He made a very important point that I am going to ask him to elaborate on now, which is that this bill has the prospect of not only improving our treaty relationships and improving the likelihood of really good adherence to treaties, but also creating more economic certainty. If we have adherence to treaties that have an economic [more]

Mr. Speaker, I absolutely would agree. As my friend so well knows, these are not commitments that are made and then forgotten. We continue to make new commitments, and we continue to attempt to honour the commitments already made, including those structures that my hon. friend has pointed out, as well as the commitments we make in this House and the commitments we make in debate by drawing [more]

C-5 Mr. Speaker, I have great respect for my colleague across the way, but regarding Bill, we will have to agree to disagree. There is text right there in Bill C-5, which is now the law of the land, that is explicit about the recognition of indigenous rights and treaty rights in a variety of ways. It is a sign of our commitment on this side of the House that we put that into one of the very first [more]

Mr. Speaker, it is a very good question. We create these structures to drive accountability. The existence of officers of Parliament is a very important structure to create accountability. The existence of the Department of Indigenous Services has helped in responding to some of the issues that were identified, especially those around clean drinking water, something that I recall working on when [more]

Winnipeg Centre Mr. Speaker, it is a pleasure to be back here with our colleagues of all sides. I will be sharing my time with the member for. C-10 We are all treaty people. This is something we sometimes say in our communities. This is something we sometimes say in the House of Commons. This is something we say to each other in classrooms, hopefully in boardrooms, in places across Canada. The [more]

I just want to pick up on what Mr. Ste‑Marie said about your composure, Ms. Burke, and your attitude that everything is under control, even though that's not always the case in our caucuses. This year, at this committee, I think we have proceeded, with your help, to have the kind of overall relationship.... We're also led by our fantastic chair, who has helped us have, overall, a very [more]

Do you have a customer service standard with respect to when someone can expect to hear back from a person at Google?

That's right, and a response and/or resolution time.

I understand. I'm speaking more on behalf of those who seek communication back from the company when they have flagged something. I want to pick up on Mr. Falk's questions about reimbursement. Again, it's a similar question. Do you have a customer service standard or written policy with respect to the potential for reimbursement when someone has been defrauded through links that might be on [more]