Dominic LeBlanc
- Born
- December 14, 1967 — Ottawa, Ontario
- Family
- Married to Jolène Richard, has an adult stepson
- Education
- BA Political Science, University of Toronto (Trinity College); LLB, University of New Brunswick; Master of Laws, Harvard Law School
- Career
- Barrister and solicitor with Clark Drummie in Shediac and Moncton; Special Advisor to Prime Minister Jean Chrétien (1993-1996)
- Political Experience
- MP for Beauséjour since 2000; Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of National Defence; Parliamentary Secretary to the leader of the Government in the House of Commons and Deputy Chief Government Whip; Leader of the Government in the House of Commons (2015-2016); Minister of Fisheries, Oceans and the Canadian Coast Guard (2016-2018); Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs, Northern Affairs and Internal Trade (2018-2019); President of the Queen's Privy Council for Canada (2018-2021); Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs (2020); Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs, Infrastructure and Communities (2021); Minister of Public Safety, Democratic Institutions and Intergovernmental Affairs (2023); Minister of Finance and Intergovernmental Affairs (2024); President of the King’s Privy Council for Canada and Minister responsible for Canada-U.S. Trade, Intergovernmental Affairs, Internal Trade and One Canadian Economy (2025)
- Notable
- Son of former governor general Roméo LeBlanc; diagnosed with chronic lymphocytic leukemia and underwent a stem cell transplant; met his stem cell donor in 2022.
Based on publicly available information — may contain inaccuracies
Business & Financial Interests
Before entering politics, Dominic LeBlanc worked as a lawyer with the firm Clark Drummie in Shediac and Moncton, New Brunswick. He also served as a special advisor to Prime Minister Jean Chrétien. Public disclosure records have shown that LeBlanc has held investments in various companies, including mutual funds and publicly traded stocks. His financial interests have sometimes been linked to his family's connections in the region, including those in the fishing industry.
Key Relationships & Connections
Dominic LeBlanc is widely known as a close personal friend of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, a relationship that dates back to their childhoods. His father was Roméo LeBlanc, a former Liberal cabinet minister, Senator, and Governor General of Canada, which established his deep roots within the Liberal Party. Through his marriage to Jolène Richard, LeBlanc is connected to the powerful Irving family of New Brunswick; his wife's sister is married to James D. Irving of J.D. Irving, Limited. This connection has been noted in media reports regarding his political roles.
Potential Conflicts of Interest
In 2018, Canada's Ethics Commissioner, Mario Dion, found that Dominic LeBlanc had violated conflict of interest rules. The investigation concluded that while serving as Minister of Fisheries and Oceans, LeBlanc's decision to award a lucrative Arctic surf clam license to a company with ties to his wife's family, the Irvings, constituted a breach of the Conflict of Interest Act. The Commissioner's report stated that LeBlanc should have recused himself from the decision due to the family relationship. LeBlanc accepted the report's findings.
Public Controversies
The most significant public controversy involving Dominic LeBlanc was the 2018 finding by the Ethics Commissioner that he had breached conflict of interest laws. The decision to award a valuable fishing license to a company connected to the Irving family, to which he is related by marriage, generated considerable media attention and criticism from opposition parties. LeBlanc defended the decision as being aimed at promoting Indigenous participation in the fishery, but ultimately accepted the commissioner's ruling that he had a conflict of interest.
Where Dominic falls on key policy spectrums
Your Money
People & Society
How We're Governed
Land & Community
Dominic LeBlanc won with 36,139 votes (60.6%)
Total votes cast: 59,631
How does Dominic LeBlanc's voting record line up with your values?
Mr. Speaker, our colleague talks about building opportunities for young people. That is exactly what our government is doing across the country. Whether through investments in major projects in Quebec and the rest of Canada, student aid, summer jobs, or assistance for industries facing unjustified tariffs, our government is always looking for the best way to help and support young people and all
Mr. Speaker, I understand that our colleague from the Bloc Québécois wishes to characterize a series of decisions in a way that is not entirely accurate, but as we have said many times in the House, the bill before Parliament is specifically intended to expedite, in a responsible and rigorous manner, projects that are in the country's economic and social interest. Just because we are moving
Prime Minister Mr. Speaker, our colleague should be very reassured that theis doing exactly that: his job. He is building a strong Canadian economy. He is diversifying our trading relationships with reliable partners around the world. He is doing what we campaigned on in the last election. I know the hon. member may prefer to forget the last election. We remember clearly the commitment we made to
Mr. Speaker, with all due respect to my friend from the Bloc Québécois, he knows full well that science is not optional in environmental impact assessments, whether the projects involved are major or relatively modest. What have we done in legislation that applies to federal entities? I understand that in the previous question, his leader somewhat overstated the impact of this bill on matters
Mr. Speaker, with all due respect to our colleague, just because she repeats overblown remarks or says things that might make a good clip for tonight's TVA news does not mean they are true. House leader As she is well aware, and as my colleague thejust said, this democratically elected Parliament is currently seized with a bill that is important to Canada's economy, including Quebec's economy.
Mr. Speaker, it is quite the opposite. We are working with Quebeckers. We are working with businesses and workers' representatives in Quebec to build a stronger economy, protect their jobs from the unjustified American tariffs and help Quebeckers and all Canadians diversify their trade. We are doing it at the Port of Montreal and at Contrecoeur, we are doing it on the west coast of Canada, we are
Mr. Speaker, I thank our colleague from Sudbury for her question. Yesterday, we introduced a bill to build Canada strong, the most ambitious reform in a generation, to strengthen and accelerate our capacity to get projects done right, strengthen our transportation networks and diversify our trade partners. Our colleague from Sudbury knows full well that we have a well-trained workforce. Her
Mr. Speaker, we know that the Bloc Québécois leader likes to exaggerate, but he is really outdoing himself today. He knows full well that the government was elected by Canadians, including many members from Quebec, specifically to build a more resilient economy, to diversify trade in response to an unreliable trading partner, and to build in a responsible way, which is exactly what we are doing.
Mr. Speaker, on the contrary, we worked with businesses in Quebec. We were constantly working with union representatives from Quebec, with the Government of Quebec. We worked with business people from across the country because we wanted an agreement that is in Canada's best economic interest, to strengthen Canada's economic and cultural sovereignty. We know that the Conservatives would have
Mr. Speaker, perhaps what our colleague fails to realize is that countertariffs are also essential to protect Canadian workers and Canadian businesses that are facing, from the United States, tariffs that are unjustified, illegal and not in compliance with CUSMA. Our colleague pretends what? Is it that we should not have taken measures to support Canadian industries and Canadian workers?
Prime Minister Mr. Speaker, our government spent many weeks this summer pursuing in good faith an agreement with the United States that would have strengthened the Canadian economy and ensured Canadian sovereignty on issues as important as cultural industries and our ability to sign free trade agreements with reliable partners. At the end of the day, theconcluded that the agreement was not