
Amarjeet Gill
- Born
- India
- Education
- MBA from the Institute of Management Studies, Devi Ahilya Vishwavidyalaya
- Career
- Realtor
- Political Experience
- Unsuccessfully contested the riding of Mississauga—Brampton South in the 2011 and 2014 Ontario elections as a candidate for the Progressive Conservative Party of Ontario. Member of Parliament for Brampton West since 2025.
- Notable
- Defeated Minister of Health Kamal Khera in the riding of Brampton West in the 2025 Canadian federal election. First Conservative to represent Brampton since 2011.
Based on publicly available information — may contain inaccuracies
Business & Financial Interests
Prior to entering politics, Amarjeet Gill reportedly worked in the business sector. According to reports, he has a background in the trucking and logistics industry.
Where Amarjeet falls on key policy spectrums
Your Money
People & Society
How We're Governed
Land & Community
How does Amarjeet Gill's voting record line up with your values?
Madam Speaker, as I said in my speech, these are the concerns we need to consider very carefully, and we need to consider a full examination of the things we are going to put forward, because we know and understand that every child matters. It is very important for us, as Canadians and as parliamentarians, to bring forward laws that are going to help Canadians and to hold people accountable for
Madam Speaker, the hon. member mentioned mental health, anxiety and other harms that are happening to our kids and our children. Parents have the greatest responsibility for protecting their children, but parents cannot control hidden algorithms or the decisions high-tech billionaire companies are taking with regard to these platforms that are available to everyone. C-34 How would Billempower
Madam Speaker, multiple times, I have said that the Conservative Party and I will support anything that is going to help Canadians. This is what we have shown in Parliament as well. The problem I am seeing right now is that parental rights and government responsibility are two different things. To answer the member's question, parents must remain the primary decision-makers for their children,
Madam Speaker, my colleague's questions are wonderful, because that is exactly what Parliament must examine. Technology companies have enormous resources. They control algorithms, platforms and user data, but are they investing enough in protecting children? If big tech companies can design algorithms to maximize profit, should they not be expected to design safeguards that prioritize children's
C-34 Madam Speaker, I am proud to rise today on behalf of the people of Brampton West to speak to Bill, the safe social media act. We all know that our children are our future. They are our greatest responsibility. They are counting on us to guide them, protect them and give them the tools to succeed, not just in our classrooms or in our communities, but in the digital world as well. C-34
Madam Speaker, I will take this opportunity to ask the member what it means to have more debt, deficits and interest payments. We all know that taxpayers are on the hook to pay the debt, which is amortizing their future and their kids' future. We have seen that everyone is struggling with affordability. Youth are struggling, and seniors are looking for relief. What are the impacts of the debt
Mr. Speaker, there were technical difficulties. My vote is no.
What measurable targets have you established for the agency's investigations, charges, prosecutions and dollars in criminal assets identified or recovered?
Does the government know where the money from extortion in communities like Brampton is going?
I will repeat my question. What measurable targets have you established for the agency, such as investigations, charges, prosecutions and dollars in criminal assets identified or recovered?
I can tell you they do not want another bureaucracy.
Do you want to answer?
As another question, the number of fraud cases reported to police is up by 140% in a decade. Police lay charges less than 10% of the time. Is that because there is no hope for a conviction?