This asks the government to protect Canadians' private property rights, especially after recent court decisions and agreements with Indigenous groups caused confusion.
What They Voted On
That, given that, (i) the Cowichan Tribes v Canada decision created massive uncertainty around fee simple property, the legal basis on which Canadians and businesses alike own their homes and land, (ii) this decision is already having significant impact on home values and the financing of projects, (iii) the subsequent Musqueam Rights Recognition Agreement has deepened uncertainty and failed to say anything definitive about fee simple property, deepening uncertainty and creating a dangerous precedent with potentially serious consequences, (iv) the government implemented the Directive on Civil Litigation Involving Indigenous Peoples, that includes Litigation Guideline #14, which discourages government lawyers from using all available arguments to defend private property rights, the House: (a) call on the government to put private property first in the Cowichan case, arguing that it has priority over all other title; (b) call on the government to replace Litigation Guideline #14 from the Attorney General of Canada's Directive on Civil Litigation Involving Indigenous Peoples that prevented the federal government from defending property rights in the Cowichan case, with a guideline that requires the federal government to aggressively defend property rights in all litigation; (c) call on the government to make no agreement without explicit property protection so that fee simple property rights are enshrined in all future agreements with First Nations; (d) call on the government to publish a plan within 30 days to protect property rights for Canadians affected by the Cowichan decision and Musqueam agreement - from the Prime Minister and with specific commitments and timelines; and (e) appoint a special committee with the mandate to study all legal, constitutional and political steps that can be taken to protect private property rights in Canada, provided that, (A) the committee be composed of 10 members, of which five shall be from the government party, four shall be from the official opposition and one shall be from the Bloc Québécois, (B) the whips of the recognized parties shall deposit with the Clerk of the House the list of their members to serve on the committee within three sitting days after the adoption of this motion, (C) changes to the membership of the committee shall be effective immediately after notification by the whip has been filed with the Clerk of the House, (D) membership substitutions be permitted, if required, in the manner provided for in Standing Order 114(2), (E) the Clerk of the House shall convene an organizational meeting within five sitting days of the appointment of the committee's membership, (F) notwithstanding Standing Order 106(2), the chair of the committee shall be a member of the official opposition, the first vice-chair shall be a member of the government party and the second vice-chair shall be a member of the Bloc Québécois, (G) the quorum of the committee be as provided for in Standing Order 118 and that the Chair be authorized to hold meetings to receive evidence and to have that evidence printed when at least four members are present, including one member of an opposition party and one member from the government party, (H) the committee have all of the powers of a standing committee, as well as the power (i) to travel, accompanied by the necessary staff, within Canada, (ii) to authorize video and audio broadcasting of any or all of its proceedings, (I) the provisions of Standing Order 106(4) shall also extend to the committee, (J) the committee shall have the first priority for the use of House resources for committee meetings, (K) it be an instruction to the committee that it hold at least 12 meetings and present an interim report before June 19, 2026.
What This Vote Is Really About
This vote is about whether the government should do more to protect the rights of people who own property, like homes and land. Some recent court decisions and agreements with Indigenous groups have made some people worried about their property rights. They fear that these decisions could make their property less valuable or harder to sell. This vote asks the government to take specific actions to reassure property owners. These actions include prioritizing private property rights in legal cases, changing guidelines for government lawyers, ensuring future agreements with Indigenous groups protect property rights, creating a plan to protect property rights, and forming a special committee to study the issue. If this motion passes, it would put pressure on the government to act quickly to address these concerns. It could lead to changes in how the government handles legal cases involving property rights and agreements with Indigenous groups. Citizens should care because this vote could affect the value and security of their homes and land.
Hover over a seat to see details, click to view the member's profile.