Kevin Lamoureux
- Born
- January 22, 1962 — Winnipeg, Manitoba
- Education
- University of Winnipeg
- Career
- Store manager, air traffic control assistant, served in the armed forces for three years
- Political Experience
- Member of the Legislative Assembly of Manitoba from 1988 to 1999 and from 2003 to 2010; twice sought the leadership of the Manitoba Liberal Party; elected to the House of Commons of Canada for the constituency of Winnipeg North in 2010
- Notable
- Younger brother, Darrin Lamoureux, was the leader of the Saskatchewan Liberal Party from 2013 to 2017. His daughter, Cindy Lamoureux, is an MLA in northwest Winnipeg.
Based on publicly available information — may contain inaccuracies
Business & Financial Interests
Before entering politics, Kevin Lamoureux served in the Canadian Armed Forces (Air Command). According to public disclosures filed with the Office of the Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner, he has declared rental income from a property located in Winnipeg, Manitoba.
Key Relationships & Connections
Kevin Lamoureux has a notable family connection in politics, as his daughter, Cindy Lamoureux, is a Member of the Legislative Assembly of Manitoba, also representing the Liberal Party. Within the federal government, he has served as the Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons, a role that involves working closely with the government's legislative leadership team.
Public Controversies
In 2017, Lamoureux faced criticism after he was seen on camera clapping as a protester was removed from the House of Commons gallery. He later apologized, stating that he was applauding the Sergeant-at-Arms for handling the situation professionally and not celebrating the protester's removal. In 2021, during a debate in the House of Commons, he accused the Conservative Party of wanting to "work with racists." The Speaker of the House intervened, and Lamoureux withdrew the remark and apologized.
Where Kevin falls on key policy spectrums
Your Money
People & Society
How We're Governed
Land & Community
How does Kevin Lamoureux's voting record line up with your values?
Prime Minister Mr. Speaker, I wonder if my colleague could provide her thoughts in regard to how the legislation is part of a bigger agenda the government has for building Canada stronger and healthier. A good example of that, as I have cited on numerous occasions, is the investment summit that thehosted, which generated close to half a trillion dollars of potential commitments coming to Canada.
Mr. Speaker, I would ask that all questions be allowed to stand, please.
Prime Minister Minister of International Trade Mr. Speaker, in the last federal election, themade it very clear. He wanted us to be able to expand trade beyond the Canada-U.S.A. border. Back in July, I had the pleasure of being at the same lunch table with the. We had the opportunity to sit down with the Prime Minister and the President of the Philippines, where we talked a great deal about
Mr. Speaker, the type of information the member put on the record is somewhat disappointing. He is saying that the price of gasoline is the federal government's fault. An hon. member: It's called tax. Hon. Kevin Lamoureux: Prime Minister Mr. Speaker, the member says it is taxes. Just over a year ago, 18 months ago, Canada elected a new. The new Prime Minister and the government got rid of the
C-39 Prime Minister Mr. Speaker, it is important to note that Billis there to support and grow Canada's economy. All one needs to do is take a look at the last 18 months, where we have had aand cabinet going out and encouraging people to seek further trade opportunities for local businesses, to seek investments, to the degree that just a couple of weeks ago in Toronto, we saw half a trillion
Madam Speaker, that is unfortunate, and a good example would be the Canada Infrastructure Bank. The Canada Infrastructure Bank is constantly criticized by the Conservative Party of Canada. Conservatives have always said that it has done nothing and that we should get rid of it, but anyone can look into that. They should not believe the briefings from the Conservative backroom, because the reality
Madam Speaker, there is no doubt that the bill will ultimately get to committee. We look forward to what the different stakeholders might have to say on the legislation. We look forward to what degree the Conservatives will position themselves on the legislation. I would like to think they would be inclined to support the legislation, or at the very least the principle of the legislation. We will
Madam Speaker, the member is wrong. At the end of the day, we had a very solid commitment to look at ways in which we can build a stronger and healthier Canada. That has been the objective of this government. We have made many steps toward it, and we will continue to do that. That includes financial and health programs.
Mr. Speaker, first of all, let us make it very clear. Under the 10 years of Stephen Harper, we actually saw zero inches of pipeline built going to the west coast through B.C. In the Trudeau era, the TMX was delivered. Prime Minister Now having said that, we have a new government and a newelected just last year. Over that year, they have attracted a great deal of investment. One needs to look at
Prime Minister Mr. Speaker, I welcome my friend back to the chamber. The member and the Conservative Party need to take a broader look at what is happening here. Thejust came back from a highly successful investment summit: half a trillion dollars, which is completely unheard of in Canadian history. This bill is part of building a stronger and healthier economy. Whether it is what took place in
Madam Speaker, I wonder if my colleague can go back to the part of his comments when he talked about the Toronto summit, an investment summit that attracted half a trillion dollars in commitments to invest in Canada, the lead-up that went into that, and how we can put that into the legislation that we are debating today. The world is looking at Canada, and it wants to invest in Canada. This
Madam Speaker, I think it is important that the member recognize, if she wants to reflect on history and talk about Stephen Harper, that we had the largest trade deficit under Stephen Harper. If she wants to talk about the hardest hit in the manufacturing industry in the province of Ontario, again, let us talk about Stephen Harper. Imagine if Stephen Harper, along with her leader, who sat around
Madam Speaker, the Conservatives consistently want to go back to the Trudeau era. If they want to go back and do a comparison, they should do a nine-year comparison to Stephen Harper when he was prime minister and the manufacturing sector that lost a quarter of a million jobs in that sector. They can contrast that even to the years that the Conservatives dream of all the time: the Justin Trudeau
Madam Speaker, I think it is important. When we think of union workers, they have a constitutional right to strike. I have always advocated that the best deal is a negotiated deal, and there is no doubt in my mind in regard to that. I have served in the Manitoba legislature. I can tell the member opposite that all sorts of political entities, whether New Democrats, Conservatives, Progressive
Prime Minister Mr. Speaker, themade a commitment to Canadians in the last election to build Canada strong and deal with issues like affordability and our health care system, not to mention the issue of crime and making our communities safer. However, building Canada strong means securing export markets. That is one of the reasons we now have 20-plus trade and security agreements since the Prime
Mr. Speaker, I hope to speak to the member's bill a little later this afternoon. I want to ask the member a question regarding the social media component to this. We know, for example, that there is a significant movement to put a limitation on children under 16 such that they cannot have social media accounts. Does the member have an opinion on that particular issue? Obviously, social media
Prime Minister Mr. Speaker, a great deal of discussion has been taking place with theand our premiers. A great deal of discussion is taking place with the Prime Minister and world investors. What we saw just recently in Toronto was the world coming to Canada to meet with our premiers and our Prime Minister. A half-trillion dollars is a historic amount of money. The member makes reference to AI.
Mr. Speaker, I would ask that all questions be allowed to stand at this time.
Madam Speaker, I have a few thoughts I would like to share with the House on the legislation and what it is that the member is actually proposing. With what the previous speaker just mentioned, it is important for us to recognize that the government took action because of a superior court decision that was made in the province of Quebec. Both the member and I have actually been around since the