Jenny Kwan
- Born
- 1967 — British Hong Kong
- Family
- Married Dan Small in 2001, two children. Separated from Small in 2013.
- Education
- Bachelor of Arts in criminology, Simon Fraser University, 1990
- Career
- Community legal advocate in Vancouver's Downtown Eastside
- Political Experience
- Elected to Vancouver City Council in 1993. MLA for Vancouver-Mount Pleasant from 1996 to 2015. First elected to the House of Commons in 2015.
- Notable
- First Chinese-Canadian member of the BC legislature. Province's first Chinese-Canadian cabinet minister, serving from 1998 to 2001. Criticized NDP leader Carole James in 2010. Involved in Portland Hotel Society controversy in 2014.
Based on publicly available information — may contain inaccuracies
Business & Financial Interests
Before entering federal politics, Jenny Kwan had a long career in provincial and municipal government in British Columbia. She was first elected to Vancouver City Council in 1993. In 1996, she was elected as a Member of the Legislative Assembly (MLA) for Vancouver-Mount Pleasant, a position she held for nearly 20 years. During her time as an MLA, she served as a cabinet minister in various roles, including Minister of Municipal Affairs and Minister of Women's Equality. Prior to her political career, she worked as a community legal advocate in Vancouver's Downtown Eastside.
Key Relationships & Connections
As a long-serving politician in both provincial and federal politics, Jenny Kwan has established relationships within the New Democratic Party. In the 1990s, she was part of a group of young, influential NDP MLAs in British Columbia sometimes referred to as the "brat pack," which included figures like Glen Clark, who would become premier. In her federal role, she serves as the NDP's critic for Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship, working closely with party leader Jagmeet Singh and other members of the NDP caucus.
Potential Conflicts of Interest
In 2014, while serving as a provincial MLA, Kwan faced an investigation related to her family's travel expenses. A review found that the Portland Hotel Society (PHS), a non-profit organization and major housing provider in her constituency, had paid for trips for Kwan and her family. The investigation focused on whether it was appropriate for a non-profit, which received government funding, to cover personal travel for a politician. Kwan stated she was unaware the non-profit had covered the full costs and subsequently repaid the amount for the trips.
Public Controversies
A significant public controversy in Jenny Kwan's career occurred in 2014 following revelations about expense claims at the Portland Hotel Society (PHS), a major non-profit in her provincial riding. It was reported that the PHS had covered thousands of dollars in travel expenses for Kwan and her family, including a trip to Disneyland and travel to the UK. The news broke amid a broader audit of the non-profit's finances. Kwan apologized, stating she believed the expenses were paid for by her then-husband and not the society. She took a temporary leave of absence from her NDP caucus duties and repaid over $34,000 to the PHS. The controversy led to widespread media coverage and public debate.
Where Jenny falls on key policy spectrums
Your Money
People & Society
How We're Governed
Land & Community
How does Jenny Kwan's voting record line up with your values?
C-39 Mr. Speaker, Billis a 231-page omnibus bill. It is legislation that claims to build Canada faster, but beneath the language are serious questions about who gets power, who gets certainty and who bears the risk. The government says this bill respects indigenous rights, protects workers and maintains environmental standards, but the details tell a different story. On indigenous rights,
C-39 Madam Speaker, indeed the government should be tabling that important information pertaining to Bill, but not just to Bill C-39. There have been many occasions when parliamentarians and Canadians have the right to know what sorts of legal assessments have been undertaken. With section 107, when the government puts a provision in Bill C-39 that is basically to override workers' constitutional
Madam Speaker, that is exactly the point that I had raised in my speech. The government is saying that it is building faster, that this is all in the national interest and that somehow magically it will protect the environment, yet it would do preemptive approvals before the work is done. As indicated, we cannot actually undo the damage. The ecosystem will not fix itself. Extinction will not
Madam Speaker, what I said was that Canada does need to build infrastructure, and what I said was that we need to build infrastructure that benefits the people. I asked a question about who has the power, who benefits and who takes the risks. This bill would put all the risks on the community, on the environment and on indigenous people, and at the expense of the government saying that it wants
C-39 Mr. Speaker, an environmental organization has warned that Billwould create sacrifice zones, where communities are expected to bear the pollution and environmental risks of projects deemed to be in the national interest. Will the government actually guarantee that no communities will be subject to making those sacrifices of health and environment as a result of fast-tracking projects under
Prime Minister Mr. Speaker, Canadians are clear that Canada is not for sale. The Liberals claim they are not selling off Canada's assets, but the doublespeak is deafening. Thesays he is not privatizing airports, yet he is inviting private investors to take over their operations, collect massive profits and make travel more expensive. In other words, it is privatization. The minister says ports
Mr. Speaker, over the course of the summer, the government consulted with unions and labour organizations. Federal unions have been calling for section 107 of the Canada Labour Code to be removed, after the government has used it to order workers back to work, undermining the collective bargaining process, at least 10 times. Now the government is proposing new language around section 107 and
Thank you very much, Madam Chair. Thank you to the committee members for allowing me the opportunity to speak to my amendment. The bill proposes a measure intended to address new funding sources for victim services through restitution orders, but what it does not address, and what we don't have, is data to measure against to determine if the funds are sufficient to effectively meet the critical
Thank you very much, Mr. Chair. It seems to me that everybody was nodding, so I take that as an affirmative. I want to thank committee members for allowing me to do that. C-26 I apologize that I wasn't here when this amendment came up. I had run into the House to deal with yet another guillotine motion on Bill. I wanted to get my comments on the record in the House with respect to that. I'm
Thank you, Madam Chair. I thought there was a commitment made by the Liberals in support of this, but clearly that's not the case.
Thank you very much, Mr. Chair. I appreciate the opportunity to add the NDP's perspective on this condo conversion developer bailout scheme. Fundamental to today's discussion is whether public housing dollars are being used to serve Canadians struggling with housing affordability or to protect private interests from market losses. Canadians are facing the worst housing affordability crisis in
Mr. Speaker, I thank my colleague for his advocacy for his community. It is absolutely essential that all parliamentarians stand up for all workers. Migrant workers have been abused in this country. Frankly, both the Liberals and Conservatives, when it was convenient for them, brought in temporary foreign workers so they could bring down wages, suppress wages. In fact, the UN rapporteur actually
Mr. Speaker, I will give an example of the challenges that, in British Columbia, and in Vancouver more specifically, we are faced with. With the francophone community, particularly in the education sector, the federal government actually can ensure that provinces receive significant increases in funding to backstop this. Do members know what we are reduced to in our education system for children
C-22 Mr. Speaker, it is quite interesting, actually. In this sitting, in these last two weeks, the government has brought down the guillotine for significant major legislation, including Bill, and we are poised to rise, probably by the end of today, I suspect. What is left on the agenda, which was not actually a priority for the government to push through, is the bill on apprenticeship to support