Bill C-219 — Law Updates: Foreign Affairs, Corrupt Officials, Economic Measures, and Broadcasting
Updates to Foreign Affairs and Anti-Corruption Laws
This proposed law aims to strengthen Canada's ability to respond to human rights abuses and corruption around the world. It would change existing laws to allow the government to impose stronger penalties on individuals who are involved in these activities. It also defines "transnational repression" as tactics used by foreign governments to silence critics living outside their borders. The proposed law would affect people who commit serious human rights violations or engage in corruption in other countries. It would also affect their immediate family members by preventing them from getting visas to enter Canada, unless the Minister believes they did not benefit from the corrupt acts. Additionally, it requires the government to publish a yearly report on its efforts to promote human rights internationally and to list prisoners of conscience that Canada is actively working to free. This proposed law matters because it would give Canada more tools to hold human rights abusers and corrupt officials accountable. It also sends a message that Canada values human rights and will take action against those who violate them. Finally, it increases transparency by requiring the government to report on its human rights efforts and explain its decisions regarding sanctions.

I am proud to present this bill, named after Sergei Magnitsky, who fought corruption. It will strengthen our ability to sanction human rights abusers and corrupt officials, stop them from using our media, and ensure Canada isn't a safe place for them.
Where this proposed law falls on the policy spectrums that Canadians care about
Set your 3 priorities to see how this bill aligns with what you care about.
Sign up free — 30 secThis proposed law strengthens Canada's ability to address human rights abuses and corruption abroad by adding "transnational repression" as a sanctionable offense and ensuring families of sanctioned individuals don't benefit. However, it leaves some discretion to the Minister, and the effectiveness depends on how thoroughly the government acts on the information it receives.
Things to Watch For
- The definition of "transnational repression" could be interpreted differently by different governments.
- The Minister has some leeway in deciding what information about prisoners of conscience to make public.
- It's unclear how the government will verify if family members received "material or financial benefit."
- The law depends on the RCMP and FINTRAC providing information, but doesn't guarantee they will.
- The disposal of forfeited property within 30 days may not be enough time to maximize its value.
- The law does not specify what happens if the Minister does not meet the 30 day deadline to recommend action.
Click any step to learn what it means
Loading...
Click any step to learn what it means
Loading...
How likely this proposed law is to be approved
Private member's bills rarely pass, and this one amends several existing laws, making it more complex and less likely to gain broad support. It's currently at the committee stage, which is a positive sign, but the overall chances are still low.

Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading comments...