Skip to main content
Parliament returns Wednesday, July 22
Back to Bills
C-219At report stage in the House of Commons

Bill C-219 — Law Updates: Foreign Affairs, Corrupt Officials, Economic Measures, and Broadcasting

Updates to Foreign Affairs and Anti-Corruption Laws

Introduced Sep 16, 2025·Last discussed Jun 18, 2026
Summary

This proposed law aims to strengthen Canada's ability to respond to human rights abuses and corruption around the world. It would change existing laws to allow the government to impose stronger penalties on individuals who are involved in these activities. It also defines "transnational repression" as tactics used by foreign governments to silence critics living outside their borders. The proposed law would affect people who commit serious human rights violations or engage in corruption in other countries. It would also affect their immediate family members by preventing them from getting visas to enter Canada, unless the Minister believes they did not benefit from the corrupt acts. Additionally, it requires the government to publish a yearly report on its efforts to promote human rights internationally and to list prisoners of conscience that Canada is actively working to free. This proposed law matters because it would give Canada more tools to hold human rights abusers and corrupt officials accountable. It also sends a message that Canada values human rights and will take action against those who violate them. Finally, it increases transparency by requiring the government to report on its human rights efforts and explain its decisions regarding sanctions.

What MPs Are Saying
Conservative
James BezanConservativeSupports

I am proud to present this bill, named after Sergei Magnitsky, who fought corruption. It will strengthen our ability to sanction human rights abusers and corrupt officials, stop them from using our media, and ensure Canada isn't a safe place for them.

Liberal
Robert OliphantLiberalWants Changes

I think this bill has good goals, but some parts could hurt people and make sanctions less effective. I want the committee to look closely at the bill to make sure it protects human rights and is good for Canada.

In the News
Motion Picture Association denounces CRTC rules on Canadian content investment
Globe and Mail·May 22Leans critical

The Motion Picture Association is speaking out against new rules from the CRTC. These rules require large streaming services to invest 15% of the money they make in Canada into creating Canadian TV shows and movies. The MPA is unhappy about having to contribute this much to Canadian content.

This article mostly shares the Motion Picture Association's concerns about the rules.

The article talks about rules for streaming services and Canadian content. But Bill C-219 is mostly about human rights and corruption.

Bill Timeline
Introduced in the House
Sep 16, 2025
Approved in principle (House)
Feb 24, 2026
Where This Lands on Key Issues

Where this proposed law falls on the policy spectrums that Canadians care about

Set your 3 priorities to see how this bill aligns with what you care about.

Sign up free — 30 sec
Bill Quality
Solid

This proposed law makes Canada's human rights and sanctions efforts more open and stronger. It requires the government to report yearly on its work for human rights and to list political prisoners. However, the government still has a lot of power to decide what information to share or not share, and new rules for family members of sanctioned individuals might be hard to meet.

Things to Watch For

  • The government can still choose to keep some information about political prisoners secret, even with new reporting rules.
  • Family members of sanctioned individuals might find it very hard to prove they didn't benefit from wrongdoing.
  • The new rules don't say how the government will get the extra money or staff needed for all the new reporting and enforcement tasks.
  • The law gives the Minister a short time to act on new information, which might rush important decisions.
  • It's not clear how the public can challenge decisions if the government chooses not to sanction someone, even with new transparency measures.
Progress

Click any step to learn what it means

What Do You Think?

Loading...

Discussion

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments...